by Thomas | Mar 6, 2008 | BizTalk
BizTalk Server 2006 R2 makes it easy to expose WCF services from BizTalk’s messaging or orchestration engines via MSMQ, TCP or HTTP (or custom WCF bindings). For SOAP web services, similar to the old Web Services Publishing Wizard, the WCF Service Publishing Wizard can be used to expose a schema or orchestration as a WCF Web service hosted in IIS. The WCF service’s .svc file, written by the wizard and used by the WCF hosting support in IIS, always points to a common BizTalk WCF assembly (depending on choice of basic or WS-* binding) versus one specific to your BizTalk application.
Since the .svc file for the BizTalk WCF web service is “generic,” BizTalk needs a way to link the WCF Web service, hosted in IIS, to a port and receive location in the BizTalk messaging engine (in a different process). This mapping is based on the service’s relative URL, the part after the domain name (like ‘/MyBTSWCFWebService/MyBTSWCFWebService.svc’). If there is a mismatch in the virtual directory name or SVC file name in IIS vs. the relative URL string entered in the receive location in BizTalk, the two will not make the connection, and you will receive an error when you attempt to connect to the web service. If you try to bring up the service in Internet Explorer, you’ll see an ASP.NET error similar to “Receive location for address “/MyBTSWCFWebService/MyBTSWCFWebService.svc” not found. (The BizTalk receive location may be disabled.)”.
The very important thing to note is that the URL matching is case-sensitive!
Not knowing this may lead to a scenario that can consume most of a day in frustration (trust me on this one). Being unaware that the virtual directory and SVC filename are case-sensitive in BizTalk, let’s say that you create the virtual directory on a new BizTalk workstation with a different case than what is configured in your common port bindings XML file (assuming that you maintain one). After deploying the BizTalk application and attempting to view the service description through Internet Explorer, you find that you receive an error stating that the receive location does not exist or is disabled.
Now, if you somehow realize that you need to correct the case, you go back and delete the virtual directory, recreate it with the correct case, and try to view the service again. Unfortunately, you see the same error again! Careful inspection will reveal that throughout the error page text, some occurrences of the virtual directory name are in the correct case, and others show up in the incorrect case of your original virtual directory name.
I can tell you that no amount of restarting IIS, redeploying the BizTalk application, re-creating the virtual directory, rebooting, or even un-configuring and re-configuring BizTalk will get you past this error! It is really nasty.
As a last hope, we started a mass search of the registry and a complete text search of the entire hard disk — and that finally resulted in the answer: the ASP.NET Temporary Files cache (<windir>Microsoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Files). Through all of the re-creating, restarting and reinstalling, the same cached files were still being used every time! Blowing away everything in the ASP.NET cache folder solved the problem. My co-worker James ran the hard disk text search and discovered this when he came back the next morning and checked out the search results.
[In case you’re curious, the specific location of the bad vdir name in the cache is Temporary ASP.NET Files<vdirname><random alphanum><random alphanum><svcfilename>.svc.<random alphanum>.compiled.]
Hopefully this will save some of you many, many hours of frustration!
Like this:
Like Loading...
by Thomas | Jan 28, 2008 | BizTalk
I’ve recently been working with an existing WCF service that does not properly export its metadata. [Note to WCF service developers: when testing your service, you need to explicitly test metadata export along with the actual service functionality. There are many ways to break it.] The Service Model Metadata Tool (a.k.a svcutil.exe) can connect to the service for metadata download (svcutil.exe /t:metadata <url>), but the result is a brief WSDL that contains no type information (no messages, no bindings, no schema at all).
The company that built the service uses the Web Services Contract First (WSCF) tool from Thinktecture to generate serializable .NET proxy classes and WSDL files from XML schemas. The service contract is defined by the XSD’s. [Note: WSCF does not directly support WCF.] Since we can’t download metadata from the service, the developers gave us a copy of their XSD’s and WSDL file (the latter generated by WSCF). Should be no problem to consume them.
In my case the service client is BizTalk Server 2006 R2, using its built-in support for WCF. BizTalk can generate a proxy (message and port types and schemas) for a service using the WCF Service Consuming Wizard. In a great example of unfriendly UI design, to reach this tool you must first have a BizTalk project open. Right-click the project and select “Add” then “Add Generated Items…”, then choose the “Consume WCF Service” option. The wizard can import directly from a running service, or it can import directly from a WSDL and associated XSD’s. The second option was perfect for our situation. Almost.
When I ran through the wizard, the wizard ended with the error “Error consuming WCF service metadata. Object reference not set to an instance of an object.” Not so good. One solution to this is quite simple, fortunately. There may be other variations in the WSDL or XSD’s that can cause the same error, but check this out first. In your WSDL file, make sure that the <xsd:schema> element has a targetNamespace attribute. It doesn’t matter what attribute value you use, just make sure it looks like <xsd:schema targetNamespace=”anything”>. The WSCF tool did not generate this attribute. Once it was in place, the wizard quickly generated the proper items in the project.
Another note: the WSCF-generated WSDL was also missing a <service> element. Without a service defined, BizTalk will generate empty binding files for the service. Be sure to include something like this in your WSDL:
<service name=”service1″>
<port name=”BasicHttpBinding_IService1″ binding=”tns:BindingName”>
<soap:address location=”http://localhost:8080/service1″ />
</port>
</service>
Make sure that the name in the binding attribute corresponds to the name attribute of your <binding> (or <wsdl:binding>) element, otherwise you’ll still end up with empty binding files.
When it’s working (most of the time), BizTalk 2006 R2 makes it really easy to both consume and publish WCF services. I’m glad that we are finally starting to move beyond the WSE and ASMX days!
Like this:
Like Loading...
by Thomas | Nov 19, 2007 | BizTalk, Personal
Digineer continues to be a leading Microsoft partner for BizTalk Server in the Twin Cities area. As of this writing, we are proud to have six consultants who have passed exam 70-235, and several like myself who also completed the 2004 certification exam. We are active in the Twin Cities BizTalk Server User Group and regularly provide content for the BizTalk Hotrod e-mag.
Since I have been so behind on my blog this year, I’m writing this in November but I passed the 70-235 exam in June (!). Passing is 700 with 50 questions total. I was pleased to walk away with an 842, despite the diabolical BAM questions they always throw in.
I think the exam was quite good as certification exams go. It covered many aspects of the product and in order to pass you will have to spend hands-on time with the product. There was quite a bit of BAM and BRE, some poorly written questions, but pretty much as expected overall. There was a question on BRE FactRetrievers that I wasn’t expecting, but otherwise, no code-focused questions.
The question types are a lot of “choose X of Y”, some straight choose-one multiple choice and some “choose the necessary steps from a list and put them in the right order.”
If you’re a current or aspiring BizTalk developer and want to be part of a group who really knows and loves BizTalk, and you’re in the Twin Cities area, please contact me. We are always looking for people who have a passion for BizTalk!
Like this:
Like Loading...
by Thomas | Nov 15, 2007 | BizTalk, Personal
This has turned out to be a very busy year, thanks in part to Microsoft’s ever-accelerating stream of product releases. Even five years ago I never thought that I’d hope Microsoft would slow down!
One of those exciting new products is Microsoft BizTalk Server 2006 R2, which features Microsoft’s new RFID platform, extensive support for EDI and all-new native WCF adapters (my favorite!). I had the pleasure of presenting at the Minneapolis/St. Paul-area BizTalk Server 2006 R2 Launch event on October 9th. My session was entitled “BizTalk Server 2006 R2: A Core Component of a Service-Oriented Architecture” and was very well-attended. Thank you to everyone who listened in! We even had Jon Flanders from Pluralsight and Michael Woods from the BizTalk product group on hand, and Michael introduced my sessions with an overview of Microsoft’s vision of SOA.
Tonight, November 15th, I’m presenting a session with my co-worker Randall entitled “Message Queuing with BizTalk 2006 R2: MSMQ, IBM WebSphere MQ and Ordered Delivery” for the Twin Cities BizTalk User Group. I’m going to talk about queuing and the pros and cons, go through some MQ configuration issues and demo the MSMQ and WebSphere MQ adapters for BizTalk. Randall is going to show some code as part of a solution for ordered delivery using MSMQ. We hope to see you there!
Like this:
Like Loading...
